Thursday, March 16, 2006

Paul Martin to officially step down as leader

It is now official that Paul Martin will not continue as leader of the Liberal Party past March 19, 2006. This means there is no possibility of him leading the party into the next election. Although I have defended him through much of the past election, I believe it is time for him to move on. Canadians usually take time to forgive a leader they punish so if he stayed on as leader, it would have only hurt the party. It is only in the last few years that people have started to think more fondly of Brian Mulroney so it will probably take time for Martin's image to recover. However, I believe history will record him as one of the best finance ministers ever. How he will be noted for his short-term as prime-minister is still debatable. Some may argue he was caught in bad circumstances, therefore he really never had a chance to do anything. Others will argue his term as prime-minister was a failure. I don't think he did an outstanding job as prime-minister, but he was caught in a very bad situation. While he had a majority government, he was rocked by the sponsorship scandal and therefore spent more time fighting the allegations of corruption than actually focussing on his vision. In hindsight he may be should have done what Chretien did and just said so what and then focused on his vision. Once he was reduced to a minority government, his only chance at recovering was if his poll numbers recovered enough that the opposition parties would have no interest in having an election, however this never happened. The Conservatives saw their best chance at coming to power (which they achieved), the Bloc Quebecois was hoping to have their best showing ever (which they thankfully failed to achieve) and the NDP saw an opportunity to have one of their best if not best showing ever (they fell short of Ed Broadbent's record of 43 seats, but still greatly improved their vote and seat count in relation to the most recent elections). With the opposition ready to take down the government at any moment, he spent more time worrying about how to prevent his government from falling than actually governing.

Anyways, in closing I wish Paul Martin and his wife Sheila Martin all the best in their future years. Although Bill Graham likely won't lead the party into the next election, should the government fall early, he will. I've always been impressed with him as a parliamentarian and therefore fully support him should the government fall early.

4 Comments:

Blogger BL said...

Hey Miles, just writing to let you know that I've created a new blog at langhjelmletter.blogspot.com, as A La Derecha seems to be on the fritz at the moment.

Just thought I'd let you know.

7:48 PM  
Blogger O'Dowd said...

Miles,

May I respectfully suggest that you are off on this one. Sure, Martin will formally resign as leader. (Remember, Trudeau did that and look how that turned out.)

I seriously doubt that Graham would stand in Martin's way if Harper was defeated (on child-care, for example) and the party was technically without a duly elected leader.

If the Liberals push the convention into Spring 2007, as I suspect, watch for them to move against Harper in the fall, at the latest.

Harper is making mistakes. Every mistake is one too many if his minority government is to survive for two years or more.

11:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm wondering who amongst us is not running for leadership of the LPC.

Stand up if you are NOT running.

I tell you, things are so bad with the LPC that it's attracted David Orchard's attention. Maybe he'll be the token westerner.

And hey, how about this Liberal leadership candidate?

http://splatto.blogspot.com/2006/03/liberal-philosophy.html

Was that Scott Reid?

AB/ba

10:00 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

David Orchard couldn't win in a weaker PC so he has no chance of winning the Liberal leadership race. His only hope is in a tight race, he could play kingmaker, but thats doubtful. He is not just to the left of the Liberals, even to left of many in the NDP who now reluctantly accept NAFTA.

9:07 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home