Monday, March 03, 2008

Alberta Election

No surprise that the Tories won another majority, but what many including myself expected to be one of their toughest fights ever, turned out to be a landslide win. The fact they increased their vote and gained seats was totally unexpected. I still haven't seen all the detail and it could very well be simply a result of a higher voter turnout this time around. Last time around, many traditional Tory voters stayed home, so I wonder if the fear of the Tories possibly not winning a majority brought many of these voters out. Also the economy has been doing well, which normally should mean the government gets re-elected, but that was certainly not the case in neighbouring Saskatchewan. The PCs did cede some ground in Calgary as expected, but it appears they kept their seat loss to the minimal, however a big surprise was their gains in Edmonton. I was not totally surprised of the PCs picking up one or two seats in Edmonton as despite Ed Stelmach's lower popularity than Ralph Klein there is a very strong Edmonton-Calgary rivalry in Alberta so it is not uncommon for the two cities to go in opposite directions, but the Tories actually dominating the city other than the core ridings surprised me. In fact looking at the maps, it appears only the core ridings of Calgary and Edmonton are painted red and orange while everything else is painted blue. This brings up the question as to what it will take to bring about change in Alberta. My argument as it has been all along is to win, one must be closest to the median voter and the reality is the average Albertan is centre-right much like the PCs. The NDP are obviously too left wing for Alberta, but even the Liberals who might be most in line with your median Ontario voter, are still too left leaning for Alberta. My advice to them is first to change their name to something such as the moderate party or centre party so as they can end this idea they are associated with the federal Liberals, who for good or ill are still widely disliked in Alberta. Also, they should adopt a centre-right platform much like the BC Liberals. But just as the Liberals and NDP may be too left leaning for Alberta, the Wild Rose Alliance is too right wing. While Albertans are more conservative than most Canadians, they are by no means the Texas of the North or Alabama of the North. Albertans still by and large share the same values as Canadians do elsewhere, they just have a different approach to achieving those goals. Some have argued this doesn't matter as Alberta is receiving so many newcomers who are more liberal than most Albertans, but I have never really bought into this. I generally believe that people after living in any location for a few years tend to develop views more or less in line with the majority of people where they live. It was often said most NDPer's in Alberta were recent newcomers from British Columbia and Saskatchewan, but after a couple election cycles, they would be voting Tory.

As for the parties, it goes without question that Kevin Taft needs to step down. Much like John Tory in Ontario, this was an election he should have gained seats, but instead lost them. While I cannot pinpoint the reasons, it is clear he will not take the party to victory. As for the PCs, they have a mandate to continue with their current approach, but should not take it as a blank cheque. As for who I would have voted, I cannot say since I am generally centre-right so I don't find the Alberta PCs too right wing for my tastes, but at the same time, I do believe 37 years in power is too long for anyone party.

Tomorrow I will have more on the Texas and Ohio primaries. If Obama wins both, then Clinton should seriously consider stepping aside as she really won't have much chance at winning, while if they each take one, Obama will still maintain front-runner status, but I expect she will stay on, while if Clinton takes both, then the race is competitive once again.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the PC party in Alberta was headed by a turnip, they'd still eke out a minority.

Alberta is hopeless. They will continue to shit out CO2 and get rich doing it, while privatizing everything and complaining about how they have to help out the rest of the country, even though their ass was supported all through droughts and depressions.

When the money/oil dries up, they will have raped their resources and sold everything to private interests. The good life will last for about 3-4 decades after that. Tops.

10:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So the chances of Dion riding on Kevin Taft's coattails and winning nine seats in the Edmonton region is far fetched to say the least.

My initial remedies.

I guess the Alberta Grits needs a David Peterson candidate like Ontario had in 1985 to get rid of the Progressive Conservatives after 42 years. I don't think there is any in the horizon with Kevin Taft being a replay of Grant Mitchell.

A new party to unite the left in Alberta may be a good idea. One of the reasons the Ontario Tories stayed in power was because you had the Liberals and CCF-NDP dividing the vote of the left. What you have in Alberta are the Grits, NDP, and now the Greens fighting for the left and the Social Credit-Wildrose Alliance battling for the right. Stelmach wins big, being the centre right alternative.

Don Mazankowski has replaced Brian Mulroney as Prime Minister and he went on to win the 1993 election over Chretien. This is what had happened in the parallel Alberta universe as of today.

11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd say Alberta is more the Colorado of the North

1:25 AM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

Anonymous - Certainly their environmental policies are not great, but it is tough to argue for tougher environmental regulations if it will hurt the economy. Hopefully as other provinces such as British Columbia show improvements can be made to the environment without harming the economy, Albertans will come on side. As for privatization, I am generally pro-privatization on most interests since for all the problems the private sector has, the government generally has a dismal record of running businesses. The reality is governments job is to govern not run businesses just as businesses should run businesses not make laws.

Mushroom - I think the Liberals need to change their name and get a centre-right leader much along the lines of Laurence Decore who did come close to winning. Besides their chances are better if the economy is doing poorly since usually governments are re-elected when the economy is strong.

King of Kensington - I agree with the Colorado of the North. Even though Colorado is a swing state, the Democrats are to the right of the Liberals and Republicans to the right of the PCs. Never mind the urban/rural split is quite similiar. I have often said Alberta is the Ohio or Pennsylvania of the North in terms of where it stands on the spectrum, but in reality it shares very little in common with either of those states, so I would say Colorado of the North and maybe Nevada of the North.

6:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Denver is quite a lot like Calgary - a city in the Rockies with a resource extraction, boom and bust economy. It's actually striking that *inner-city* Calgary is held by the Tories federally while the city of Denver is Democrat surrounded by GOP suburbs but this is a dynamic unique to Canada in that the Liberals are considered unfriendly to Alberta ("western alienation" there has a different dynamic given that the combined population of the West and South in the US exceeds that of the Northeast and Midwest). The Conservatives also don't get a majority of the vote in inner-city Edmonton.

Culturally Colorado and Alberta are similar in that it has a lot of social conservatives but also a lot of secular people too - not exactly Alabama!

1:57 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

King of Kesington - Actually the Denver suburbs split right down the middle as Adams County narrowly went for Kerry in 2004 while Jefferson and Aprahoe County narrowly voted for Bush. However, I fully agree with your take on the Western Alienation issue. In fact, I suspect that had the Liberals never adopted the National Energy Program and historically been more friendly towards the West, they would be in better shape. In both Edmonton and Calgary, the Alberta PCs got under 50% although if you combine their vote with the Wildrose Alliance they did get over 50% in Calgary, but not Edmonton. Either way, it seems the Alberta PCs dominated areas outside the core of the city. In fact the only none core riding to go for the Alberta Liberals was Calgary-McCall and this was only after the advanced polls were counted as the PCs were leading the whole night here.

The other interesting thing is the Tories got roughly the same share of the popular vote in Edmonton and Calgary which has almost never happened before. It has usually been the case that the Tories would do better in Calgary than Edmonton.

As for Colorado, it is more libertarian than social conservative although in the Colorado Springs area they have a strong social conservatiive base much like rural Southern Alberta.

4:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home