Friday, January 13, 2006

Conservative Victory Imminent?

Anyone who has followed the recent polls is no doubt aware that the Conservatives are approximately 10 points ahead of the Liberals and on the cusp of a majority government. The question now comes, can the Liberals turn it around in ten days. My response is yes they can, although the odds are not very good. Clearly the Conservatives have run an outstanding campaign, which is why they are where they are. Much of their success has come from the middle class male suburban voters who tend to be centre-right, thus not afraid of the Conservatives, but not hardcore conservatives either. Urban voters, women, youth, and gays & lesbians still for the large part remain terrified of a Harper victory. Below I will give my analysis on the some of the recent events by the two major parties;

Liberals: The Liberals released their red book this week. On the whole it had many policies I liked and despite my general unhappiness with the campaign so far, the Liberals have generally tended to run to the left and govern to the right. Some policies I particularly liked was to stop clawing back a $1 of social assistance for every $1 earned since this creates a welfare trap, which discourages people from trying to seek work. I also liked their policies of making Canada more competitive globally and I agree with Martin that it is not just the United States, but the European Union, China, India, and Brazil who will become major competitors in the 21st century. Their part of banning weapons in space is the part that got the most attention despite being a relatively minor point. It is a noble goal, which I wholeheartedly endorse, but I don't think it will work since the United States under Bush doesn't care what others think and will do what they want. On the attack ads, my comments are posted below, but let me repeat, the military one was despicable and whoever's idea it was should be immediately fired. The other ads were legitimate quotes although the tone was a little overly negative. I was also quite disappointed on their comment that entrenching property rights in the Charter would lead to child labour, weaker environmental laws, and a whole host of doomsday scenarios. I agree in the 30s in the United States property rights were abused, but that is a different era and besides you can write it differently to avoid those problems. Nevertheless I think it is more rhetoric than anything since the Bill of Rights already provides protection for property rights. I think Blue Grit sums it up quite well so I won't go into more detail. I am also quite pleased with how they handled the David Oliver issue in Abbotsford. While these are just allegations, the Liberals not only prevented him from sitting in the Liberal caucus should he win as the Tories did yesterday with Derek Zeisman, they banned him from using anything associated with the Liberals in his campaign, will return the $1.75 for every vote he receives and he will re-adjust their spending limits to 307 candidates instead of 308. The Tories on the other hand only banned Derek Zeisman from sitting in the Tory caucus and were not as quick to act. Still I think this will not help or hinder either party. I must say I find it puzzing David Oliver would try to bribe the NDP candidate not to run since this is the safest conservative riding in BC, so even the combined NDP + Liberal vote still wouldn't be enough to win this. This might have made sense electorally in other ridings, although certainly indefensible still. In Summary, I think the Liberal campaign has been terrible, but I still like the platform and I still don't trust Stephen Harper so I will reluctantly vote Liberal, at the very least to ensure Harper only gets a minority, not a majority. I should finally add I will get to see Paul Martin in person on Monday since he is making a speech at the Vancouver Board of Trade, which I am a member of.

Conservatives: To date they have run a pretty solid campaign, but now with the Liberals releasing some of his past statements, so I think people should give the Tories a good hard look. At the very least, check out your local candidate first and don't vote Conservative in ridings with religious fundamentalists (my riding isn't one of them), but only ones with moderate candidates. Vic Toews past statements on abortion are quite troubling as are Rondo Thomas' from Ajax-Pickering's insulting statements of declaring war on all supporters of same-sex marriage. Check this video out of Rondo Thomas declaring war on supporters of same-sex marriage. This guy should also be told he cannot sit in the Conservative caucus if he wins. Also Paul Forseth's wife, Maureen Forseth called Christians to rally around him since he would promote Christian values in parliament . As Joyce Murray, the Liberal candidate rightly pointed out, an MP should represent all religions not just some. Another troubling part of Stephen Harper is is the speech he made to the far right Canadian Alliance for Social Justice and Family Values who have in the past compared homosexuality to bestality and compared Chretien and Martin to Hitler. Anyone who associates with such group should raise a certain amount of suspicion. His comment that he still holds his conservative views from the 1997 speech is also troubling. Today the Tories released their platform. I haven't read the whole thing, but most of it has already been announced. I did like the part on the capital gains tax cut. There have been some concerns it may lead to deficits and I think that is partially true, but not totally. Under the current conditions, they could easily meet their spending priorities without going into deficit, but if the economy took a turn for the worse, then they would unless they held off on their spending plans, which is probably what they would do, at least I would hope. However, there are three recent statements by Harper I have trouble with. The first one is pulling out of Kyoto. I was against Canada ratifying the agreement in the first place since I didn't feel we could realistically meet the targets and I don't think we can. But once you ratify a treaty, if you decide to pull out, it can do major damage to the country's international reputation. I think what he should of said, is I don't believe we can realistically meet our Kyoto targets, but we will try our best to at least cut pollution well below its current levels. Secondly, he said he was interested in re-opening the BMD talks. Although it is not likely a major issue, I would rather he keep his distance from the United States until Bush leaves the White House. Finally, his decision to not commit to the Kelowna agreement is unacceptable. There was a lot of effort put into dealing with First Nations issues and to pull out now shows the party's lack of understanding for First Nations' issues. I know our premier in BC, Gordon Campbell worked very hard on putting this summit together so I think ignoring it would be completely wrong.

Prediction: Conservatives 110-130 seats, Liberals 90-120 seats, BQ 50-65 seats, NDP 20-30 seats, so still winneable for the Liberals, but not highly probable.

17 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

good

mynewsbot.com

9:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Double standards again.

Miles opposes Stephen Harper for his stand on same sex marriage and forgets to mention that Paul Martin also voted for traditional definition of marriage and, from what I hear, 2 dozen other Liberal MPs are opposed to same sex marriage, some to gay rights of any description or protection of gays from hate crimes, all without so much as a peep from their leader.

Beyond that, Stephen Harper has vowed not to use the NWC, meaning he will allow a vote in parliament, after which the issue will die and go away. It's actually brilliant.

Women's rights: it's in the Conservative blue book, on Stephen Harper's insistence, that no legislation should be brought to limit a woman's right to an abortion. Is it in the red book?

Let me repeat, in complete opposition to the Fiberals atack-lies - Stephen Harper said it was a deal breaker - if the conservatives did not agree to a woman's right to abortion that he would walk. Please Miles, provide information on Paul Martin's similar courage.

In another section, Miles admits that Liberal MP and Paul Martin appointed parliamentary secretary Andrew Telegdi is a racist, and not only has been left free within the Lieral party to promote his racist beliefs - but has been rewarded with systematic promotion within the party by no less than Paul Martin.

As you admit yourself, Telegdi is hardly the only Liberal nut case runnning in southern Ontario.

The Aboriginal agreement in Kelowna? It was a cobbled together recipe for disaster - more billions to spend doing the same ineffectual things we have already spent hundreds of billions on - to little benefit for Canada's Frst Nations people.

Indian and Northern Affars Canada is a textbook description of an agency that spends billions actually worsening the living conditions of the people it is supposed to serve.

In its own pathetic way, INAC is racist by virtue of its paternalistic policies that promote continued dependence, if not on Chief and Council by band members, then by Chief and Council on Ottawa. I say hurrah to Stephen for daring to try another way.

Not sure how you can fault Harper either for wanting to pull out of Kyoto and developing our own CO2 reduction targets. So far we have had - what(?) - worse than nothing from the Liberals.

Chretien-Martin say they support Kyoto while Canada's greenhouse gas emissions rise at twice the rate of the United States - yes - twice.

(Did I mention that Paul Martin's leased aircraft, from a Liberal-friendly charter company, is a Boeing 727 that emits between 2 and 3 times as much greenhouse gases per kilometre as Stephen Harper's leased Airbus, paid for, at $1.75 /vote by Canadian taxpayers?)

You say quitting Kyoto would do Canada's international standing harm. I disagree.

We have agreed to targets we will never - NEVER meet. The result is that we haven't even tried. Setting realistic, achievable targets will result in more effort and better success, better than being a laughingstock.

Finally, I dislike, viscerally hate to tell the truth, George Bush as much as anyone, you included from what I can tell, but the Americans seem to have, at long last, dropped the notion that global warming is scientific hooey and are meeting with other Kyoto non-signatories to discuss an alternate plan. Maybe their plan is to talk it to death, who knows. But if Canada could lead, or be a significant part of, an agreement that brings the U.S. and China into the fold - that would realy be something.

Bottom line? If you like what Paul Martin says, you'll love him. If you look at what he's actually done, you'll say, "huh? who's that dope?"

Speaking of what one says: You know those ads? Stephen Harper and culture of defeat in Atlantic Canada? Turns out Paul Martin once described Atlantic Canada as having "a culture of dependence."

Cute.

I just have to go find a neat article about Tony Valeri, and will be back.

AA

12:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi again, as promised earlier, I have an item about Tony Valeri, Paul Martin's appointment as house leader.

Before I get to it though, you should know that Valeri was interviewed by the RCMP on Friday as to what he knew about the Goodale income trust decision and, it turns out he knew it all.

Now to the story:

MP faces questions after gaining $275,000 in three months on property sale

Hamilton Liberal cabinet minister Tony Valeri has vowed to take legal action over "attacks on his integrity" after a Spectator story revealed he more than doubled his money in three months when he flipped a neighbouring property to the son of a prominent businessman with ties to the Liberal party.

"I have people out there that are intent on attacking my integrity....I'm saying enough is enough, I'm going to take action today to ensure that the people responsible for this are held to account," Valeri said on CHML's Roy Green show today.

He declined to name anyone he suspects.

Valeri, Liberal MP for Hamilton East-Stoney Creek, purchased the property on Ridge Road along the escarpment in upper Stoney Creek for $225,000 last April.

Three months later, Valeri sold the property for $500,000 to John Ng, son of Joe Ng, whose Hamilton-based engineering company has been a longtime supporter of the Liberals at the federal and provincial levels.

...

Joe Ng's engineering company has been a long-time financial supporter of the federal Liberals, with contributions totaling at least $16,000 since 1993.

Valeri indicated that Joe Ng has contributed to his election campaigns in the past.

"Certainly I know that he has contributed to the Liberal party," said Valeri.

In 1993, the largest single donation to the campaign of former Hamilton East MP Sheila Copps was a $5,500 contribution from Ng's company.

That was the same year that Ng's engineering firm won a large contract in China, with the help of a $4.5 million U.S. loan from the federal Export Development Corporation to the Chinese purchaser.

Ng's company also benefitted from a special EDC loan in June 2002 to a Chinese bank that allowed Ng's company to win a contract for a heating project.

Joe Ng has also participated in a number of Canadian trade missions.

Well, who knows.

Liberal Cabinet Minister makes unusually high profit on land sale.

Land sale to Liberal financial supporter.

Double his money in 3 months.

To a liberal supporter.

In a city. In Canada.

We are not making this up.


AA

12:56 AM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

Anonymous - Paul Martin opposed same-sex marriage, before the lower courts ruled on the issue, but since he supports the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, he complied, whereas Stephen Harper still wants to overturn the same-sex marriage law, despite being not possible in 8 provinces and 1 territory without using the notwithstanding clause. As for abortion, I know the party's policy, but I am concerned it will be past through a private members bill, which would go to a free vote and most candidates are pro-life as well as a few maverick Liberals

On Andrew Telegdi, the guy is an idiot and even Warren Kinsella has donated to his opponents to help have him defeated. As for the Kelowna Agreement, I am concerned since the Reform/Alliance/Conservatives in the past have often been hostile to aboriginal issues. In addition Gordon Campbell who is probably more of a conservative ideologically than liberal played a major role in bringing together this conference which all ten premiers including Bernard Lord and Ralph Klein supported. If one wants to improve relations with the provinces, then honour agreements you make with them

As for Kyoto Protocol, we should have never signed in the first place if we couldn't meet the targets, but once you sign an agreement you don't back out. Instead the Conservatives should try to cut emissions as much as possible and when they fail to meet the targets they can always blame the previous government. Pulling out is not the answer. Hopefully next time around we will insist that the targets be realistic before signing and actually have a plan in place. The reason we signed quickly is Chretien wanted to ratify it before he stepped down so it would be part of his legacy. I put the blame here more on Chretien than Martin.

As a final word I am not totally a Liberal mouthpiece. I condemned their military ad and I also think their comments about property rights leading to child labour were completely stupid as well, so I do disagree with them from time to time.

10:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To answer your concern that the "Reform/Alliance/Conservatives" in the past have often been hostile to aboriginal issues:

Today, the Congress of Aboriginal People, an alliance representing 800,000 off-reserve and off-settlement Indian and Metis will endorse the Conservative Party.

So there it is.

The vested interests who have created third world living conditions on Canada's reserves support the Liberals.

Those representing the growing tide who are fleeing the reserves in search of hope, are endorsing the Conservatives.

You sould, but ddn't note that the Consevatives have endorsed the targets set out in the Kelowna agreement. But the agreement does not specifically say how to get there and the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP all disagree.

The fiberal line on the conservative Aboriginal position is in line with the rest of their fear and smear campaign - the one with words but without substance.

OA

12:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re Valerie,

I note he doesn't appear to be denying the basic facts of the house flip, who it was flipped to, and the status of the purchaser.

So his threats of a lawsuit appear to be nothing more than a base attempt at intimidation.

BTW, if Valerie does end up suing someone, I'd strongly urge that person to counterclaim based on abuse of process (bringing an action for an ulterior purpose - in this case to silence critics during an election).

4:54 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

anonymous - I heard the Metis Council, BC Indian chiefs, and Phil Fontaine, the assembly of First Nations have all endorsed the Liberals and are terrified of a Harper victory. I haven't seen any newspaper stories on this, so a link would be helpful

5:19 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

Never mind, I checked the Conservative website, so my mistake about aboriginals. I also think it really depends on who drives the policy. If it is Jim Prentice the likely minister for aboriginal affairs, I agree it will work well, but if it is Tom Flanagan, a close confident of Harper, this would be a disaster. I'll believe it when I see it put into action.

5:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mils: I also think it really depends on who drives the policy. If it is Jim Prentice the likely minister for aboriginal affairs, I agree it will work well.

Yes, it was Jim Prentice. And if the Conservatics win, yes, I'm almost certain he will be Minister responsible.

11:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re: Valerie. The cicumstances are suspicious but there's nothing concrete to prove it's a payoff f some sort.

But, either the neighbour sold to Valerie at a ridiculously low price or the fiberal contributor/contractor paid a idiculously inflated price. Other neighbours say - the original sale price was about right and the contributor/contractor paid way above market value.

Either way, you'll have heard the last from Valerie about this - h won't want it back in the news if he can possibly avoid it.

If I recall, Valerie was leading the fiberal storm troopers when they were jackbooting all over constitutional convention in the spring. Of course, protecting the constitution in the spring would have meant holding a non-confdence vot as rquired by constitutional convention before Belinda Stronach jumped ship.

Now of course, they sully the flag by wrapping themselves in it - as long as it suits them.

It's a "value," that I haven't mastered, saying one thing while doing the opposite.

11:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From CTV News:

One of Harper's pronouncements on Saturday was that gay and lesbian couples would be eligible to receive child-care benefits.


Is that in the Red Book fiberal fear and smearmongers?

12:01 AM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

anonymous - Stephen Harper allowing childcare to extend to gays and lesbians is a step in the right direction, but it won't change my vote, or I should say cannot change my vote since I voted in the advanced polls today.

1:45 AM  
Blogger Platty said...

In regards to the Tony Valeri property sale, one of two things happened;
Either:
Mr. Valeri was paid far above market value by a friend of the Liberal party without the property ever being put on the market or,
Tony Valeri took advantage of an elderly man in frail health to realise a huge profit.

2:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Miles: I voted in the advanced polls today.

Does that mean we have to stop meeting like this?

I see Martin was in Montreal today and drew about 200 onlookers - half of whom didn't even have to stay up past their bedtime.

The best thing Liberals in Montreal could do for national unity is vote Conservative as Francophone Quebeckers outside Montreal have made it clear that Haper's conservatives are their first and only federalist choice.

Too bad it won't happen.

By the way, the fiberals are still running a version of the military attack ad in Quebec.

We pulled that ad!" Ya, right. Click.

9:42 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

Anonymous - glad to hear you've voted in the advanced polls. Maybe Harper will be better for national unity, but based on his past statements, I happen to think not. I realize I am fighting a losing battle, but I do not regret my vote for the Liberals at all. I am still uncertain about what a Conservative government will mean. Since it looks like we will get one, I guess we will see next time around.

9:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the news today:

"It's time for us to go back to the grassroots, examine what we stand for and renew ourselves. It's quite difficult to rebuild while you're in power."
-- Anonymous Senior Liberal, Canadian Press, January 20, 2006

"There's no obvious (leadership) candidate to replace him? That's okay, we'll find one. We can't do worse than we are now."
-- Anonymous "long-time Martin supporter", Canadian Press, January 20, 2006

"[F]ormer Liberal ministers John Manley and Martin Cauchon, who are not running in this election, have leadership Web sites. Less publicly, the phones are being worked by or on behalf of these and other potential candidates, including Brian Tobin, a former federal minister and premier of Newfoundland."
-- Don Macpherson, Montreal Gazette. January 20, 2006

"COMING SOON! www.martincauchon.com. This domain is now ACTIVE but the web site is still under construction."
--- www.MartinCauchon.com, January 20, 2006

8:36 PM  
Blogger Monkey Loves to Fight said...

Yes some Liberals may be conceding, but Paul Martin hasn't and I am not entirely sure they won't win. It is unlikely, but still possible considering undecided voters usually tend to break for the Liberals. I still think they can pull it off.

11:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home